Module 9 · Exam Strategy in Action · Lesson 36
Planning, drafting and editing to time
Warm-up · Section 1
4 minIn your last timed Writing task, name the MINUTES you spent on plan, draft and edit. What was over budget?
If you had only 3 minutes to edit, which TWO things would you check FIRST? Defend in one sentence each.
What do you LET GO of when the writing clock hits 40 minutes? Be honest.
Grammar focus · Section 2
8 minQuick rule
Editing under time uses three visible moves: (1) SUBSTITUTE — swap one word for a more precise one ('issue' → 'structural issue'). (2) CUT — strike through whole sentences that don't earn their place. (3) RECAST — rewrite a sentence with a different syntactic frame (active → passive; statement → cleft; vague → calibrated). All three should leave a VISIBLE TRACE on the page — examiner-friendly proof of an editing pass.
Examples
SUBSTITUTE — 'It's a problem' → 'It's a STRUCTURAL issue' (precision).
SUBSTITUTE — 'I think' → 'On the balance of the evidence' (calibration upgrade).
CUT — 'It is interesting to note that…' [strike through; sentence adds nothing].
RECAST (active → cleft) — 'Funding caused the problem' → 'It was funding, not policy, that caused the problem'.
RECAST (flat → calibrated) — 'This will lead to problems' → 'This is highly likely to lead to disruption in the short term'.
Quick check
Question 1.Best SUBSTITUTE move for 'It's a problem' in a Band-3 draft:
Question 2.Which sentence should you CUT under 3-minute editing pressure?
Question 3.Best RECAST of 'Funding caused the problem' for emphasis:
Question 4.What does VISIBLE editing show the examiner?
Question 5.Edit priority order under TIME PRESSURE:
Vocabulary · Section 3
6 minthe 8/30/7 split
the canonical minute split for a 45-minute Writing task
e.g. I install the 8/30/7 split on every timed task — 8 to plan, 30 to draft, 7 to edit.
Use it now
Say your CURRENT split and which number is wrong.
↻ Recycled in exam-skills
earn its place
(of a sentence) contribute enough value to justify the words used
e.g. Filler openers don't earn their place — cut them in the first edit pass.
Use it now
Name ONE filler sentence you tend to write that doesn't earn its place.
↻ Recycled in writing
substitute / cut / recast
the three visible editing moves under time
e.g. Three substitutes, two cuts and one recast in seven minutes is a Band-3-to-Band-4 shift.
Use it now
Pick the move you DEFAULT to and the one you AVOID.
↻ Recycled in exam-skills
edit by priority
fix register before grammar, grammar before vocabulary, etc.
e.g. Edit by priority — a register mismatch costs more marks than a missing comma.
Use it now
Say your top-2 priorities for the next 7-minute edit window.
↻ Recycled in exam-skills
the let-go list
items you accept LOSING under time pressure to protect higher-value items
e.g. My let-go list is: perfect handwriting and the last 10 words of the conclusion if the clock demands it.
Use it now
Name ONE thing you'll let go of NEXT time.
↻ Recycled in homework
the read-aloud test
30-second silent read-aloud check at minute 38 of 45
e.g. The read-aloud test catches register slips that the eye misses — even silent it works.
Use it now
Try it: read your last draft silently aloud and name ONE catch.
↻ Recycled in homework
Pair / group discussion
Complete each stem about yourself
Rank & justify
Rank these by IMPACT per minute of editing time:
Quick write (60 seconds)
Write your own 25-word personal editing rule starting 'Under time pressure, I edit ___ before ___ because ___'.
Pronunciation · Section 4
3 minAt minute 38 of 45, the candidate should silently or quietly mouth their draft for 30 seconds — focused on register markers (opener, closer, modal verbs, hedges). The voice catches what the eye misses: a formal opener with a casual closer, a flat 'will' where calibrated 'is highly likely to' was intended, a long sentence where a marked structure would have landed harder. Drilling the read-aloud test at the same EVEN, slightly slow tempo each time makes it a reliable instrument, not a panic.
Reading · Section 5
8 minSame prompt · same candidate · same 45 minutes
Same essay opening paragraph, before and after the 7-minute edit. The edits are deliberately visible — strike-through, arrow, substitution — the marks examiners would see on the page.
Notice the visible editing moves — substitute, cut, recast · Pre-reading
FIRST PASS (minute 0-30): 'It is interesting to note that education is one of the most important things in modern society. Many people think that university must be free for all. They depend from public money. The government cannot to ignore this problem. There will be problems if we don't fix it soon.'
AFTER 7-MINUTE EDIT (visible moves): '[STRIKE 'It is interesting to note that'] Education is one of the most important [SUBSTITUTE 'things'→'public goods'] in any modern society. Many people [SUBSTITUTE 'think'→'argue'] that university should be free at the point of use. They depend [SUBSTITUTE 'from'→'on'] public funding, and [RECAST 'There will be problems if…'→'this is highly likely to become a structural problem if the current trajectory continues'].
FINAL (clean): 'Education is one of the most important public goods in any modern society. Many people argue that university should be free at the point of use. They depend on public funding, and this is highly likely to become a structural problem if the current trajectory continues.'
Question 1.Which editing move was used on 'It is interesting to note that'?
Question 2.Which move turned 'things' into 'public goods'?
Question 3.Which move turned 'There will be problems if we don't fix it soon' into 'this is highly likely to become a structural problem if the current trajectory continues'?
Question 4.The 'depend FROM' → 'depend ON' fix is which error pattern from L34?
Question 5.The edited version is closer to Band 4-5 because:
Listening · Section 6
8 minNotes
Listening audio
Tap play to listen. Scrub the bar or use ± 5 s to jump.
Speaker 1 (Italian, m, exam coach):The single biggest fix for most candidates is RESERVING the 7 minutes at the end for editing. They under-plan, over-draft and then have nothing left for the substitute / cut / recast pass. I'd argue the 7 minutes at the end is worth two band notches — more than any extra vocabulary.
Speaker 2 (Irish, f, recent candidate):What I'd let go of is the conclusion. Honestly. If I'm at minute 38 and the conclusion is still half-drafted, I'd rather have a shorter conclusion with the read-aloud test done than a longer one without. Examiners read the opener and closer most carefully — protect them, not the middle.
Speaker 3 (French, m, writing tutor):My students confuse editing with proof-reading. Proof-reading is commas and spelling — that's the LAST 90 seconds. Editing is structural — substitute, cut, recast — that's the FIRST 5 minutes of the 7. Doing them in the wrong order means you tidy the surface of a flat draft.
Speaker 4 (Polish, f, teacher):I'd push back on rigid splits. The 8/30/7 is a default, not a law. For my best candidates I'd recommend 10/28/7 — two extra minutes of planning earns its place because the draft writes itself. For weaker writers, 6/32/7 because the draft itself needs more thinking time. The 7-minute edit is the only non-negotiable.
Speaker 5 (Australian, m, recent Band-5 candidate):On the balance of what I tried across three mocks, the read-aloud test at minute 38 was the single highest-return move. I caught a register slip and a modal mismatch in 30 seconds — both worth a band notch. The voice catches what the eye misses.
Question 1.Speaker 1's key claim is:
Question 2.Speaker 2 would LET GO of:
Question 3.Speaker 3's distinction between editing and proof-reading:
Question 4.Speaker 4 pushes back on rigid 8/30/7. The non-negotiable is:
Question 5.Speaker 5's highest-return move was:
Visual stimulus · Section 7
3 minMemorise the default split. Personalise IF you have evidence from at least two mocks that another split serves you better.
Notes
Discuss in pairs
Where would YOU re-allocate one minute, and from where? Defend in one sentence.
Exam skills · Section 8
3 minStrategy
Example
Worked plan (8 min, prompt: 'Are public libraries still relevant?', P2 Essay): register cell = formal-essayist · opener: 'Across most European cities, the library has become both more and less visible…' · closer: cleft sentence on the dual function · P1 thesis: libraries have shifted role, not lost relevance · P2 evidence: physical space evolution · P3 counter + concession (Module 6) · P4 calibrated recommendation. Marked structure: inversion in P3 ('Not only have libraries lost…, but they have also…'). Calibrated claim: 'on the balance of the cases reviewed, the shift is highly likely to continue rather than reverse'.
Practice · Section 9
7 minQuestion 1.I install the 8/30/7 ____ (SPLIT) on every timed task.
Question 2.Filler openers don't ____ (EARN) their place — cut them in the first edit pass.
Question 3.Edit by ____ (PRIOR) — register before grammar, grammar before vocabulary.
Question 4.The ____ (CALIBRATE) claim replaced a flat 'will' with 'is highly likely to'.
Question 5.A visible ____ (STRIKE) -through is proof of an editing pass.
Question 6.Read-aloud is the ____ (HIGH) -return move at minute 38.
Writing · Section 10
4 minYour task
8-MINUTE TIMED PLAN. Choose ONE prompt (teacher offers): (a) 'Should governments fund the arts?' (P1 essay); (b) write a proposal to your manager on the four-day working week (P2 proposal). Plan ONLY today; full 45-minute draft + edit is homework.
Before you submit
PLAN — Prompt (a) 'Should governments fund the arts?' (P1 essay). Register cell: formal-essayist (academic). Opener: 'The case for state funding of the arts has been argued for over a century, and the case AGAINST it for almost as long.' Closer: cleft on the third way — 'It is the framing of the choice, not the choice itself, that needs revisiting.' P1 — Frame: present the dichotomy honestly (state vs market). P2 — Evidence: state funding has produced specific, named cultural goods we couldn't get otherwise. P3 — Counter (Module 6 diplomatic): 'I'd push back, however, on the assumption that state funding is the ONLY route to public art.' P4 — Calibrated recommendation (L26): 'On the balance of the historical evidence, state funding is highly likely to remain a structural component, but not the only one.' Marked structure: inversion at the start of P3 — 'Not only does state funding underwrite the canon — it underwrites the experimentation that becomes the next canon.' Calibrated claim: closer line. Diplomatic move: P3 opener. Time check: 8 min — done.
Speaking · Section 11
6 minSpeaking (4 min) — defend your editing PRIORITIES aloud. Read your plan to your partner. The partner challenges: 'why register first, not vocabulary?' / 'what would you let go of if the clock hits 38 and you're 50 words short?'. You defend with the edit-priority order from today.
Partner rates the defence.
Are the edit priorities NAMED, ORDERED and DEFENDED?
Named, ordered, defended
Band-5 strategy talk — install before next mock.
Named but not ordered
Add the priority order — register → grammar → vocab → spelling → commas.
Ordered but not defended
Add ONE reason per priority — 'register first because mismatch costs more marks than commas'.
General intent only
Specifics, not 'I'd edit carefully' — name the moves.
Useful phrases
Optional · Teacher-led
Stretches if time allows. ~14 min total
Homework · Section 12
Take-homeFull 45-minute task on the prompt you planned today. Use the 8/30/7 split strictly — set a timer, watch the minutes, leave 7 minutes for editing NO MATTER WHAT.
Edit-only drill: take a recent Band-3 draft of your own. Apply EXACTLY 3 substitutes, 2 cuts, 1 recast — strike-throughs and arrows visible. How long did the edit take? How much higher does the draft read?
Record yourself doing a 30-second silent (or whispered) read-aloud test on your edited draft. Did you catch any register or modal issues the eye had missed?
Build a personal LET-GO list — five items you accept losing under exam time pressure to protect higher-value items. Keep visible on your desk for the run-up to exam day.
Recap · Section 13
Wrap-up